

Стивен Кинг "саундтреки" (часть 1 и 2)
#1
Отправлено: 21 Июль 2004 - 20:02:16
Имеется возможность выпустить аудио CD и МС (в двух частях, реальным тиражом) с музыкальным материалом, упомянутым СК в своих произведениях. Ориентировочное название : "Стивен Кинг - soundtracks" ( заранее прошу прощения за несколько некорректную формулировку). Хотелось бы услышать ваше мнение по поводу целесообразности сего прожекта. Насколько мне известно, существует некий опыт на этом поприще на просторах России ("Харуки Мураками -soundtracks part ##1,2,3)...
С Уважением,
Visitor
#2
Отправлено: 21 Июль 2004 - 20:10:12
Цитата
Имеется возможность выпустить аудио CD и МС (в двух частях, реальным тиражом) с музыкальным материалом, упомянутым СК в своих произведениях. Ориентировочное название : "Стивен Кинг - soundtracks" ( заранее прошу прощения за несколько некорректную формулировку). Хотелось бы услышать ваше мнение по поводу целесообразности сего прожекта. Насколько мне известно, существует некий опыт на этом поприще на просторах России ("Харуки Мураками -soundtracks part ##1,2,3)...
С Уважением,
Visitor

#3
Отправлено: 21 Июль 2004 - 22:25:37
#4
Отправлено: 21 Июль 2004 - 23:04:59
Чувствуется, что он с любовью и знанием дела подошел к этому вопросу, не ограничавшись просмотром "копирайтных" ссылок автора в амер. первоисточниках; указал любое какое-либо упоминание музыкальных моментов.
Конечно же, идея не нова: было б странно предположить, что внимательный читатель не обращал взор на всевозможные "муз. вкрапления" СК в повествования, усиливая настрой, либо добавляя "драйв" в происходящие события... Немного разбираясь в музыке, IMHO, можно сделать вывод, что подобный сборник был бы не просто своеобразной познавательной иллюстрацией к прозе писателя, но и сильным сборником различ. муз. направлений (от «махрового нешвильского кантри» до густой психоделии «рокочущих» 70-х и т.д.)
#5
Отправлено: 09 Август 2004 - 11:56:01
http://www.kvadro.ru/news.htm#king
Жду комментарии и рецензий по поводу 1-го сборника. Заранее спасибо
С уважением ко всем, Visitor
#6
Отправлено: 16 Август 2004 - 13:20:27
Имхо клево будет, если во вкладыше к диску пропишут где какая песня упоминается!
#7
Отправлено: 17 Август 2004 - 17:09:45
ged (Aug 16 2004, 10:20 AM) писал:
Имхо клево будет, если во вкладыше к диску пропишут где какая песня упоминается!
В полиграфическом вкладыше к CD и MC указано, в каком именно произведении упоминается каждая из представленных композиций.
#8
Отправлено: 17 Август 2004 - 18:21:17
visitor (Aug 17 2004, 08:09 PM) писал:
ged (Aug 16 2004, 10:20 AM) писал:
Имхо клево будет, если во вкладыше к диску пропишут где какая песня упоминается!
В полиграфическом вкладыше к CD и MC указано, в каком именно произведении упоминается каждая из представленных композиций.
А "Стивен Кинг. Soundtracks 2" уже вышел?
#9
Отправлено: 17 Август 2004 - 19:45:08
'We are happy family' (2003)?
Please, не могли бы выложить (на англ.)?
#10
Отправлено: 17 Август 2004 - 21:25:20
ged (Aug 17 2004, 03:21 PM) писал:
visitor (Aug 17 2004, 08:09 PM) писал:
ged (Aug 16 2004, 10:20 AM) писал:
Имхо клево будет, если во вкладыше к диску пропишут где какая песня упоминается!
В полиграфическом вкладыше к CD и MC указано, в каком именно произведении упоминается каждая из представленных композиций.
А "Стивен Кинг. Soundtracks 2" уже вышел?
Вторая часть готова к выпуску. Весь вопрос в спросе. Если "1-й" оправдает затраты, то "материальное воплощение" "2-го" не за горами
#11
Отправлено: 25 Август 2004 - 15:05:30
#12 Сэй Roman
Отправлено: 26 Август 2004 - 11:02:57
#13
Отправлено: 12 Сентябрь 2004 - 12:18:40
MOZG (Aug 17 2004, 04:45 PM) писал:
'We are happy family' (2003)?
Please, не могли бы выложить (на англ.)?
First of all I want to say that I liked Disco and if you have a problem reading quote/unquote Liner Notes from someone who liked Disco, then it's a bona fide case of tuff titty said the kitty. Second of all I need to say that I didn't agree to do these quote/unquote Liner Notes because I thought WE'RE A HAPPY FAMILY, the CD you how hold in your sweaty little hands, would be particularly good. I agreed because I loved the Ramones from the first time I heard them, gabba-gabba-hey and all that, but even more importantly because Rob Zombie asked me to do it and one rule of my life is NEVER SAY NO TO A MAN CALLED ZOMBIE. Also Mr. Zombie made HOUSE OF 1000 CORPSES, a movie for Ramones fans if there ever was one (you know it's true even if all you know about it is the f*ckin' title) and Universal Pitchers is just 2-chickenshit to release it and I thought I might get an advance look if I was on Mr. Zombie's good side (I'm an optimist and thus believe he must have a good side). But tribute albums? Ogod, I thought. Usually just an occasion for RECORDING ARTISTES to cover songs the could not have thought up in they wildest wetdreams (you know it's true). Also an opportunity for the record companies to do what they do best, which is to Rake In the Long Green. Johnny Cash tribute album? Piece O' Sh*t (except for Johnny Cash himself). Elvis tribute album? Total Piece O' Sh*t (Elvis ain't on it). Chuck Berry tribute album? Not too bad, as it was from the movie HAIL HAIL ROCK AND ROLL. Little Richard tribute album? Not a Piece O' Sh*t because it hasn't been made yet. When it has been, it will probably be a Piece O' Sh*t. But, I thought, I hafta give this thing at least 1 token listen, then I can write maybe 500 words (about the Ramones, not the record, I never thought I'd write about the record) and I might cet to see Mr. Zombie's movie. And at least, I thought, there are some good people on this record and it will be interesting to see how they f*** up the 3-chord majesty (okay, sometimes 4) of Joey. Johnny, Dee Dee, Marky, and Tommy (plus C.J. and Richie). I look at the list of trax. Hmmm, I say, only one song over 4 minutes, a good sign. And while the Ramones probably never recorded a 4-minute song in they lives (at feast on a stew-dio album), this one is by The Pretenders, who are great. Also I see a lot of people on this record who might actually be able to do a Ramones song, since groups like The Offspring, Green Day, Garbage, Rancid, etc. Kind of sprang from the collective forehead of the Ramones like Thor from the forehead of Zeus (or maybe I'm thinking about Bruce Banner & The Incredible Hulk). But they will f*** it up, I think. Every tribute album is a Piece O' Sh*t, this is the Fabled Automatic, like how if you drop your toast on the floor it always lands butter-side-down where the dog took a piss, or how you can't get snot off a suede jacket. Only guess what? It's good. This is a kind of record that you treasure. (And just by the way, I refuse to call recorded songs on round things CDs even if they are CDs, they'll always be f***in' records to me). This is the kind of record you Dlay until you're sick of it and then put it away and find it five years later in the trunk of your car or under a pile of crusty skivvies and wiDe off the dried beer-scum and buff it up and stick it in your player and it sounds just as good as it did the first time. It's a miracle. It's impossible, but it's also a fact. It's a fine record. The reasons are two-fold. First, the Ramones made great rock and roll music from RAMONES in 1976 all the way to ADIOS AMIGOS in 1995. Second, almost all the playerson this record stuffed the Artistes business where the sun does not shine and just made great rock and roll. I think they did it because they respected what the Ramones were and what the Ramones did, which was to sort of save rock and roll, at least for a few more years. That brings us back to Disco. I told you we'd get here. I never had a bumper-sticker on my car saying DISCO SUCKS or DISCO IS DEAD, ROCK IS ROLLING. I wanted one, I was jealous of that in-your-face 'tude, but I did not in fact believe Disco Sucked. As K.C. of K.C. and the Sunshine Band used to say, "That's the way (oh-ho, uh-huh) I like it." It wasn’t the only way liked it, I’m not that sick a puppy, but yes. I did. Only remember, some people also like kudzu, a plant that grows on just about anything and strangles everything around it. Disco was musical kudzu. While was playing my new WE’RE A HAPPY FAMILY record and getting ready to pen my Musicological Ruminations, it occurred to me that Disco and the Ramones were pretty much simultaneous orgasms. Checked it out, and yep, it’s a fact. SATURDAY NIGHT FEVER came out in 1977, the same year the Ramones released thesublime LEAVE HOME and the even sublimer ROCKET TO RUSSIA. K.C. and the Sunshine Band? Donna Summer? Same time-frame. And how can you not like songs like "Bad Girls", "Keep It Comin’, Luv", or "Disco Inferno", by the Trammps? You can’t. Or at least I couldn’t not like them. But… kudzu, remember? Musical kudzu. Even while I was dicging it I was understanding that Disco wasn’t rock and roll exactly, but… something else. The Ramones were rock and roll. “I Wanna Be Sedated” was rock and roll. Donna Summer, that was what people listened to in the back of the limo while they snorted Peruvian F ake through $100s. The Ramones, on the other hand, sang about getting high on a budget: sniffing glue and huffing various household products like Carbona ("Carbona Not Glue" was cut from their second album). Disco was John Revolta in his white ice cream suit, doing these incredible steps while he looked lovingly down at his own reflection. The Ramones were about old leather jackets and ripped jeans (see 1st album cover). Disco was Donna Summer crooning "Ooooooooooh luv to love you, baby." The Ramones were about screaming until your lungs popped out your nose and just sort of hungthere ears bpulsing on your upper lip and banging your head until your f***in ed. And the Ramones had more than a little range. Yes they did. There’s no rock and roll ballad ever written that’s more straight from the heart than "Danny Says." (Not on this record, so solly, Cholly). And what about "I Wanna Be Your Boyfriend"? Sweet little girl, I wanna be your boyfriend – there’s nothing in the entire slick, big-bucks Disco catalogue as affecting as that one line. Do you love me back? What do you say? I say that maybe the Ramones, who never had a Top-10 hit, saved rock and roll when it needed saving, and I miss them. I never knew how much until I heard the songs on this record. And one other thing before I go. You heard a Ramones song and you wanted to play that song. Most people never get a chance. I did, because I happen to be in band with a group of writers – the Rock Bottom Remainders, we call ourselves. At a gig in early 2002, I got to sing "Rockaway Beach" for about 1500 screaming people: "Rock rock, Rockaway Beach/ Rock rock, Rockaway Beach/ Rock rock, Rockaway Beach/You can hitch a ride to Rockaway Beach" And now that I think of it, maybe the biggest difference of all is hiding in that song – the difference between the Disco People, who probably would have killed rock and roll and walked away from the corpse without so much as a backward glance, and the Headbangers. Disco People put on their expensive disco clothes and went to Studio 54 or maybe the Peppermint Lounge. The Punkers and the Headbangers went to Rockaway Beach. Hitched to Rockaway Beach. Once my radio station in Bangor put on a Ramones concert (well, Cheap Trick headlined, but to it was a Ramones concert). My wife and I went out to dinner with the band afterward. Joey ordered "Beef tornadoes", and when the waiter went away, he (Joey) turned to me and said "F*** him if he don’t get it." But Joey got his boeuf tournados and left the guy a $20 bill under his plate. And back in 1983 that was twenty dollars, son. They were a great band, and I miss them one hell of a lot more than I do Harry "K.C." Casey and Donna Summer. Because some music is harder to make than other music, and in the end it means more. I don’t know ifany of this makes sense to you, but it makes sense to me. It makes sense to my heart. Some bands are tough enough to be tender ("Sweet little girl, I wanna be your boyfriend"). Some bands are too tough to die. The Ramones were one of those. This record is the proof. The people who play on it showed respect and made what’s almost a Ramones record. I bet they liked doing that. I bet they had fun. I know I did, playing "Rockaway Beach" and eating beef tornadoes with Joey Ramone. I wouldn’t have missed it for the world.
Stephen King
August 18, 2002
Эх, жаль что Стиви ни словом не упомянул о песенке Рамоунов "Pet Sematary" (нужно обязательно включить в volume II сабжа), но мне все равно понравилось

#14
Отправлено: 12 Сентябрь 2004 - 16:22:10

Мечтаю о подборке из ТБ

#15
Отправлено: 27 Сентябрь 2004 - 18:56:01
Kak_Trotsky (Sep 12 2004, 01:22 PM) писал:

Мечтаю о подборке из ТБ

Что касается "Лунатиков" . Конечно, сущетвует сонм великолепных вариаций этой "нетленки", в сборнике представлено именно то исполнение и аранжировка, на которую ссылается автор.
Насчет "Блю Ольстер Кальт": увы, эта композиция (действительно, примечательная по драйву и т.д) не "отмывается" по действующему международному Авторскому праву. Включение ее в сборник повлекло бы значительные авторские отчисления, поставившие под сомнения целесообразность всего проекта (в этом месте напрашивается контрапункт обыгрывания логотипа этой группы: три вопросительных и один восклицательный знак(I hope, you got it).
Я надеюсь, что второй сборник (тьфу-тьфу, через левое) также порадует меломанов и "кингеров" приятными "аудиоожиданностями" или для кого-то и "неожиданностями", но, всё равно, со знаком "плюс"...
С уважением,
visitor